Government plans to burn £4 billion of unusable personal protective equipment (PPE) to generate power have been criticised by MPs as potentially costly – both financially and to the environment.
Hackney South and Shoreditch MP Dame Meg Hillier has described the purchasing of PPE as "perhaps the most shameful episode in the UK government response to the pandemic".
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) lost 75 per cent of the £12 billion it spent on PPE in the first year of the coronavirus pandemic to inflated prices and faulty kit.
This included £4 billion worth which could not be used because it did not meet NHS standards.
MPs raised concerns about “inappropriate”, unauthorised payoffs made by health bodies to staff, warning that more of these are likely to happen amid the large-scale restructuring of the NHS.
During the pandemic, three clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) paid special severance payments without the required approval from the Treasury, the committee said.
Dame Meg, who chairs the PAC, said the DHSC has done little to “put its house in order” after wasting “huge amounts” of public money.
The Labour MP said: “The story of PPE purchasing is perhaps the most shameful episode in the UK Government response to the pandemic.
“At the start of the pandemic health service and social care staff were left to risk their own and their families’ lives due to the lack of basic PPE.
“In a desperate bid to catch up, the Government splurged huge amounts of money, paying obscenely inflated prices and payments to middlemen in a chaotic rush, during which they chucked out even the most cursory due diligence.
“This has left us with massive public contracts now under investigation by the National Crime Agency or in dispute because of allegations of modern slavery in the supply chain.
“Add to that a series of inappropriate, unauthorised severance payoffs made by clinical commissioning groups in the first year of the pandemic and the impression given falls even further from what we expect.
“The DHSC singularly failed to manage this crisis, despite years of clear and known risk of a pandemic, and the challenges facing it now are vast, from getting the NHS back on its feet to preparing for the next major crisis.
“There are, frankly, too few signs that it is putting its house in order or knows how to.”
The PAC has urged the DHSC to clarify its plan to dispose of unusable and excess PPE, including predicted costs to the Treasury and to the environment.
Chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) Pat Cullen said the burning of PPE is a “galling” reminder that the DHSC’s approach to procurement may also have cost nurses’ lives.
She said: “Our members will find this galling.
“It is a painful reminder of the worst of the pandemic – inadequate or wasteful PPE.
“Sending billions of pounds up in smoke when NHS and care services are struggling will be hard for them to comprehend.
“If this money had been used more wisely and decent quality PPE bought in the first place, then nurses’ lives might have been saved.
“It will be critical, if we are to truly learn the lessons, for the forthcoming public inquiry to pin down causes and to say clearly where mistakes were made so they are never repeated.”
Schools minister Robin Walker told Times Radio said: “Clearly there were huge pressures on government at the start of the pandemic, we needed to make sure that we secured as much protective clothing and vaccines, and everything else that was required, in as short a time as possible.
“I think it’s clear that some mistakes were made during that time period and it’s right that there have been apologies for that.
“I have to say overall, though, we’ve been able to protect lives, we’ve been able to protect the economy, we’ve had a hugely successful vaccine rollout and we were one of the first countries to be able to open up after the pandemic, which has put our economy in a stronger place where we can now afford this help with the cost of living.
“So, I do think we have to look at the overall picture and we have to learn the lessons where mistakes were made in a totally unprecedented situation which ministers at the time were facing.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here